The Future of Law and AI

The recent lawsuit between Getty Images and AI art generator Stable Diffusion has brought to light the legal and ethical issues surrounding the use of AI in the creation of art, but what about the legal industry ?

A lawsuit that has been filed in the Federal District Court of Northern California against the creators of two AI image generators, Stable Diffusion and Mid-Journey.

The suit claims that Stable Diffusion is committing copyright infringement on a massive scale by using copyrighted images in their training dataset without the consent of the image owners or website operators. However, the lawsuit is not just about copyright infringement, but also about whether the use of these images constitutes fair use.

The plaintiffs argue that images generated by Stable Diffusion are derivative works, which means they cannot be created without the authorization of the copyright owner. However, if the images are found to be transformative, meaning they alter the original work with new expression, meaning, or message, then they would not be considered infringing. The outcome of this case will have major implications for the use of AI in creating art and other forms of content.

As a curious dude following the case, I decided to put the capabilities of AI to the test by asking it to write an argument on behalf of Stable Diffusion and Mid-Journey.

The results were astounding:

In the case of Stable Diffusion and Mid-Journey vs Getty Images, we would like to present the following arguments to defend against the accusations of copyright infringement:

Lack of intent: Our clients had no intent to infringe on the copyrights of Getty Images or any other party. The purpose of the text-to-image model is to aid in creative and artistic expression, not to unlawfully reproduce copyrighted material.

Fair use: The text-to-image model may fall under the doctrine of fair use, which allows for the limited use of copyrighted material without permission for the purpose of commentary, criticism, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.

Transformative use: The images generated by our clients’ technology are transformative and not direct copies of the copyrighted material. They are new and original works that add value to the public by providing new perspectives and insights.

Limitations on liability: Our clients have implemented strict usage guidelines and terms of service that prohibit the use of their technology for any illegal or infringing activities. They should not be held liable for any infringing actions taken by users of their technology.

Innovation and progress: As Steve Jobs said, “Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower.” Our clients’ text-to-image model represents a new and innovative use of technology, and progress should not be stifled by copyright infringement allegations.

The pursuit of knowledge: As Socrates said, “The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.” Our clients’ technology is part of the ongoing pursuit of knowledge and understanding, and this pursuit should not be hindered by accusations of copyright infringement.

The power of imagination: As Alan Turing said, “Sometimes it is the people no one can imagine anything of who do the things no one can imagine.” Our clients’ technology is a tool that empowers the imagination and creativity of users, and should not be limited by copyright infringement allegations.

The importance of imagination: As René Descartes said, “Imagination is the source of every human achievement.” Our clients’ text-to-image model is an important tool for imagination and creativity, and should not be hindered by copyright infringement allegations.

We believe that the evidence and arguments presented demonstrate that our clients, Stable Diffusion and Mid-Journey, are not guilty of copyright infringement, and we respectfully request that the court dismiss the charges brought forth by Getty Images.

The AI was able to present a solid argument, complete with references to fair use and transformative use, as well as limitations on liability.

The increasing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the legal profession raises important questions about the future of the legal field. For example, if AI can present a compelling argument in court, what is the role of the lawyer in the courtroom? According to Dr. Richard Susskind, an expert in legal technology, “AI is capable of performing many of the routine and repetitive tasks previously done by lawyers, such as document review and legal research. This means that the traditional role of the lawyer as a legal expert may soon be replaced by that of a legal technician, or someone with strong interpretive skills.”

“AI is not a replacement for lawyers, but rather a tool that can be used to augment their skills and improve their efficiency.”

The legal profession is facing a significant shift due to the integration of AI. It is important for lawyers to recognize the potential of AI and adapt to the changing landscape, rather than resist it.

The number of research papers on legal handling of AI is rapidly increasing in recent times. As AI technology becomes more prevalent in various industries, the need to address legal and ethical issues related to its use is becoming increasingly important. Many experts in the field are conducting research to better understand the legal implications of AI and to develop guidelines for its responsible use.

This trend is expected to continue as AI technology continues to evolve and become even more integrated into our daily lives.

As Dr. Susskind notes, “The legal profession must embrace AI and other technologies, or risk becoming irrelevant.”

This is not to say that AI will completely replace the need for lawyers. But it does highlight the importance of adaptability and the need for lawyers to constantly evolve and update their skills in the face of new technologies.

In conclusion, the use of AI in the courtroom is a significant development that has the potential to change the legal profession. It is important for lawyers to recognize the potential of AI and adapt to the changing landscape, rather than resist it. It also opens new opportunities for people who want to make a living in law related field but without formal education in law.

Please share your thought with me on Twitter

PS : This article was written with OpenAI.